2016 Mitsubishi Lancer — Full Specifications
As an Amazon Associate and CJ Affiliate and AWIN publisher we earn from qualifying purchases. Links below are affiliate links.
Running gear matters most — before anything else, UK: check tyre prices at TirendoUS: check wheel & tyre prices at WheelHero for this car's fitment.
The 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer is a saloon/sedan offered with 2 engines (2L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl). Its most fuel-efficient configuration returns around 36 mpg (UK) / 30 mpg (US EPA) combined, with 30–36 mpg (UK) across all configurations. Owners often keep a Mitsubishi Lancer workshop manual to hand for servicing and repairs.
Compared with the 2015 Mitsubishi Lancer: Fuel economy is essentially unchanged at around 36 mpg (UK) combined. No longer listed: 2L 4-cyl turbo. It carries the same 4★ overall NHTSA rating.
Full Specifications
| Engine (most efficient) | 2L 4-cyl |
|---|---|
| Engine options | 2L 4-cyl · 2.4L 4-cyl |
| Transmission (most efficient) | Automatic (AV-S6) |
| Fuel Type | Regular Gasoline |
| Powertrain | Conventional |
| Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Body Style | Saloon/Sedan |
| Length | 4245 mm |
| Width | 1610 mm |
| Height | 1326 mm |
| Passenger Volume (EPA) | 93 cu ft (2,633 L) |
| Luggage Volume (EPA) | 12 cu ft (340 L) |
| Fuel Economy (UK) | 36 combined / 32 urban / 41 extra-urban mpg |
| Fuel Economy (US EPA) | 30 combined / 27 city / 34 highway mpg |
| CO₂ Emissions | 185 g/km |
| EPA Greenhouse Gas Score | 6 / 10 (10 = lowest emissions) |
| EPA Est. Annual Fuel Cost | $2,250 (15,000 mi/yr, US prices) |
Engine & Transmission Options
EPA lists 5 configurations for the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer across 2 engines (2L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl). Combined fuel economy ranges from 25 to 30 mpg (US), or 30 to 36 mpg (UK), depending on engine, transmission and drive. The headline figures at the top of this page describe the most fuel-efficient configuration.
| Engine | Transmission | Drive | MPG (UK) | MPG (US) | CO₂ g/km | Fuel cost / yr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2L 4-cyl | Automatic (AV-S6) | Front-Wheel Drive | 36 | 30 (27/34) | 185 | $2,250 |
| 2L 4-cyl | Manual 5-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | 34 | 28 (24/33) | 200 | $2,400 |
| 2.4L 4-cyl | Automatic (AV-S6) | All-Wheel Drive | 31 | 26 (23/30) | 209 | $2,600 |
| 2.4L 4-cyl | Automatic (AV-S6) | Front-Wheel Drive | 31 | 26 (24/31) | 206 | $2,600 |
| 2.4L 4-cyl | Manual 5-spd | Front-Wheel Drive | 30 | 25 (22/30) | 218 | $2,700 |
MPG (US) shows combined, with city/highway in brackets. Highlighted row = the configuration used for the headline figures. Source: US EPA fueleconomy.gov.
EPA measures interior passenger volume at 93 cubic feet (about 2,633 litres) and luggage volume at 12 cubic feet (about 340 litres). These are US EPA interior-volume figures; they are measured differently from the boot capacity numbers UK manufacturers quote.
Owner Essentials for the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer
Running Costs: 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer
Covering around 8,000 miles a year in a 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer at 36 mpg combined, expect roughly 1,010 litres of fuel annually — multiply by your local price per litre for a cost estimate. For US owners, the EPA estimates about $2,250 a year in fuel for the most efficient configuration (15,000 miles, national average prices). Work out exact fuel costs with the fuel cost calculator on 247Calculators.
Convert between MPG and L/100km with the unit converters on 247QuickTools. Not sure what tyre size fits? 247TyreCheck explains tyre sizing.
Only need this car occasionally? See our buy vs rent comparison.
2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Safety Ratings (NHTSA)
Recalls & Owner Complaints (NHTSA)
NHTSA lists 2 safety recall campaigns that include the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer (as of 6 October 2026). Most affected areas: Electrical system (1), Power train (1). A campaign often covers several model years or models, so check your own VIN to see whether your car is affected.
- Electrical system — campaign 17V609000, reported 29 September 2017. Risk: If the engine stalls, there is an increased the risk of a crash.
- Power train — campaign 16V563000, reported 28 July 2016. Risk: A hesitation during acceleration can increase the risk of a crash.
Owners have filed 30 complaints with NHTSA about the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer. The most-reported areas are Power train (21), Vehicle speed control (4), Electrical system (4). Complaints include 1 reported crash, 2 reported injuries. That is close to the median of 26 complaints across the 8 Mitsubishi Lancer model years in our data.
Used-buyer checklist for the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer
Based on where NHTSA recalls and owner complaints cluster for this model year, these are the areas worth checking before you buy:
- Transmission & drivetrain (1 recall campaign · 21 owner complaints) — On the test drive, watch for hesitation, jerking or slipping between gears and ask for transmission service history.
- Electrical system (1 recall campaign · 4 owner complaints) — Test every switch, window, light and warning lamp on a test drive, and ask about battery or alternator replacements.
- Throttle & cruise control (4 owner complaints) — Check throttle response and cruise control are smooth, and ask about any software or throttle recalls.
Source: US NHTSA recall and consumer-complaint databases, retrieved 6 October 2026. Complaints are unverified owner reports, not confirmed defects. Check any vehicle by VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls, and see our guide to checking a used car for recalls.
How It Compares
Mitsubishi models in our database average about 33 mpg (UK) combined on their most efficient configuration; the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer's 36 mpg is 3 mpg above that make average. Its 185 g/km CO₂ figure is 19 g/km lower than the 204 g/km Mitsubishi average.
Of the 8 Mitsubishi Lancer model years we cover, the 2016 is the most economical on its best configuration (36 mpg UK combined). See every Mitsubishi Lancer year side by side.
Last updated: · Data: US EPA (fueleconomy.gov) and NHTSA safety ratings 18 July 2026; NHTSA recalls and complaints 6 October 2026; Wikidata & curated EU catalogue 18 July 2026; European generation and engine data from Wikipedia 7 October 2026
Vehicle data sourced from manufacturer specifications. Always verify with your vehicle handbook or a qualified mechanic. This is a reference tool, not professional advice.
Recommended Accessories for the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer
Frequently Asked Questions
What engine does the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer have?
EPA lists 2 engines for the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer: 2L 4-cyl, 2.4L 4-cyl. The most fuel-efficient configuration pairs the 2L 4-cyl with a automatic (av-s6).
What is the fuel economy of the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer?
The most efficient configuration returns around 36 mpg (UK) combined, or 30 mpg on the US EPA cycle. Across all configurations the UK combined figure runs from 30 to 36 mpg.
How much does the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer cost to fuel per year?
The US EPA estimates about $2,250 a year in fuel for the most efficient configuration, based on 15,000 miles of mixed driving and national average fuel prices. Your own cost will depend on mileage and local prices.
Does the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer have a good safety rating?
It holds an overall NHTSA rating of 4 stars, with 4 stars for frontal crash protection.
Does the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer have any recalls?
NHTSA lists 2 safety recall campaigns that include the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer (as of 6 October 2026). Most affected areas: Electrical system (1), Power train (1). A campaign often covers several model years or models, so check your own VIN to see whether your car is affected.
What are the most common problems reported for the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer?
Among the 30 owner complaints filed with NHTSA, the most-reported areas are Power train (21 complaints), Vehicle speed control (4 complaints), Electrical system (4 complaints). Complaints are unverified owner reports, not confirmed defects, and raw counts rise with how many cars were sold.
How much interior and luggage space does the 2016 Mitsubishi Lancer have?
EPA measures interior passenger volume at 93 cubic feet (about 2,633 litres) and luggage volume at 12 cubic feet (about 340 litres). These are US EPA interior-volume figures, which are measured differently from the UK boot-capacity numbers manufacturers quote.